From these highland deposits, obsidian was transported via canoes along waterways to the wider region. Major deposits of Mesoamerican obsidian besides Pachuca came from the highlands of Jalisco (western central Mexico) and the highlands of Guatemala (El Chayal and San Luis Jilotepeque). If A duly requires something from B, the "duly" speaks of what is proper for A (namely, to require something), while the "require" puts an obligation on B, to provide something.Mesoamerican trade in obsidian, though, goes back much earlier than the Toltecs, with evidence it was exchanged in the second millennium BCE during the period often called the Early Formative. But the "ought" applies to two different parties. The sense of a possible redundancy I think comes from the fact that both "duly" and "require" convey a sense of obligation or "ought". with "duly" being redundant): it adds the sense that the requirement is proper or expected. So to answer your question, "duly require" is not quite the same as "require" or "need" (although someone could use it that way, i.e. such a requirement does not seem justified. This is opposed to a store unduly requiring your telephone number or social security number in order to complete a transaction. Meaning, car financing companies require a credit report and that is proper/fitting/expected that they require one. when I google (bing) for this phrase, the first hits contain
(On the other hand, the writers of this Ethiopian document may not be native English speakers, or their dialect may be a little different from mine.)Īside from this example, I think the meaning of "duly require" is straightforward: it means to properly or fittingly require something. Moreover, "military duty" and "military duties" appear several times in the document, whereas "duly require" does not. Makes perfect sense and sounds more natural. Usually when "military" is a noun, it is preceded by "the". And that doesn't sound right in the phrase "the exigencies of military". I say this because if "duly" were really intended, "military" would have to be a noun.
I'm pretty sure that in the given example, it's a typo for "duty". The word duly was probably thrown in as a general safe-guard without much thought. Similarly, the rules will usually be formulated broadly enough to allow you to break lesser rules in case of an emergency at your own discretion if you thereby uphold a greater principle. If your superior orders you to murder innocent people, that is not something military service requires of you, but rather the command of a nutcase.
You are not obliged to carry out such an action and will not incur punishment if you don't.Įven so, it could be said that the overlap with require is large enough to leave out duly. In that case, it could be said that military service unduly requires you to carry out a ruinous action or a war crime. Or a situation may arise that the rules could not have foreseen.
Duly noted meaning dictionary full#
However, there may be exceptional circumstances, in which a drunk superior officer orders you to shoot an entire village full of innocent people. In most circumstances, you must obey your superiors and the rules must be followed. Military service may require various actions of you, as your superior or the rules make demands on you. While duly may be pleonastic in combination with require, it is probably not so here.
0 kommentar(er)
